Waterline one-to-many with arbitrary foreign keys -

-

is possible have 1 sided one-to-many relationship between 2 models?

what i'm trying achieve plugin architecture, core app server has base set of models, specific implementation different clients can include custom data plugins.

so have notion of core entity (super-simplified):

{ identity: 'entity', attributes: { id: 'integer', type: 'string' } }

ok, i'm going add passport plugin store login credentials.

{ identity: 'passport', attributes: { id: 'integer', protocol: 'string', username: 'string', password: 'string', entity: { model: 'entity' } } }

so far good. want add user plugin, user extends entity, user can have number of passports. tried first:

{ identity: 'user', attributes: { id: 'integer', name: 'string', email: 'string', entity: { model: 'entity' }, passports: { collection: 'passport', via: 'entity' } } }

now things come unstuck in waterline (but it's reasonable data model). here's error:

trying associate collection attribute model doesn't have foreign key. user trying reference foreign key in passport

the point of exercise entity rather abstract concept, , things passport supposed add behaviour without having know concrete implementation (user) looks like. because want plugin architecture, passport can't know user explicitly.

it otherwise quite elegant solution. there way coax waterline doing want? thanks.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PHP DOM loadHTML() method unusual warning -

-
i had following code works fine on localhost: $document = new domdocument(); $document->loadhtml($p_result); $form = $document->getelementsbytagname('form')->item(0); // code continues using $form variable after same code updated on outside server, loadhtml() failed , issued warning. warning: domdocument::loadhtml() expects parameter 1 valid path, string given in path/name/to/script.php returned null instead of object code pretty gets fatal error. note contents of $p_result absolutely same on outside server , on localhost. but why displays kind of warning , why not work? doesn't loadhtml() expects argument 1 string in first place? why method expects parameter 1 valid path ? just make clear i'm not calling loadhtmlfile() , i'm calling loadhtml() . thanks. you're affected one of php bugs . issue present in php 5.6.8 , 5.6.9. have affected php version on server, , bug-free version on localhost. the bug forbids null
Read more

python - How to create jsonb index using GIN on SQLAlchemy? -

-
here's current code creating index jsonb. index("mytable_data_idx_id_key", mytable.data['id'].astext, postgresql_using='gin') but got error. sqlalchemy.exc.programmingerror: (psycopg2.programmingerror) data type text has no default operator class access method "gin" hint: must specify operator class index or define default operator class data type. [sql: "create index event_data_idx_id_key on event using gin ((data ->> 'id'))"] is there way create index on sqlalchemy? the postgresql specific sqlalchemy docs @ http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/dialects/postgresql.html#operator-classes mention postgresql_ops dictionary provide "operator class" used postgresql, , provide example illustrating use: index('my_index', my_table.c.id, my_table.c.data, postgresql_ops={ 'data': 'text_pattern_ops',
Read more

c# - TransactionScope not rolling back although no complete() is called -

-
i'm using transactionscope rollback transaction fail bool errorreported = false; action<importerrorlog> newerrorcallback = e => { errorreported = true; errorcallback(e); }; using (var transaction = new transactionscope()) { foreach (importtaskdefinition task in taskdefinition) { loader.load(streamfile, newerrorcallback, task.destinationtable, processingtaskid); } if (!errorreported) transaction.complete(); } i'm sure there no transactionscope started ahead or after code. i'm using entity framework insert in db. regardless state of errorreported transaction never rolled in case of error. what missing ? transactionscope sets transaction.current . that's does. wants transacted must @ property. i believe ef each time connection opened reason. probably, connection open when scope installed. open connection inside of scope or enlist manually. ef has nasty "design decision": default opens
Read more